Earlier this month, Cherub, a fundraising and deal-matching platform that connects startup founders with angel investors, held a private, application-only summit for 100 creators looking to learn more about angel investing and startup equity. Elsewhere, newly minted creator marketing agency JERi is building out its own roster of creator councils with pre-vetted creators it can offer up to startups looking to get creators to sit on their boards.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cCreators are looking for ways to diversify how they\u2019re getting paid, and creating revenue streams for strategic consult instead of just the execution is a really interesting way to [look for] longevity in their careers,\u201d said Emily Ward, co-founder of JERi and Love X Money Ventures, an early-stage venture capital and angel investment fund. The fund recently vetted creators to join social fashion app Driptail as strategic equity investors, which grew its user base by 60x from March to July of this year.<\/p>\n
Ross Yellowlees, JERI\u2019s co-founder, said their \u201cverticalized\u201d creator councils are pre-vetted groups of creators that JERi can bring to brands across a variety of categories, from tech and sports to beauty and B2B. These creators can be involved from the very start of a company\u2019s journey, helping with strategy, cultural insights and creative, or later on for things like product reviews and recommendations.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cCreators are no longer just creators; they\u2019re businesses. And if you look at any business, you know, whether it\u2019s a marketing agency or a media agency or whatever it may be, all of them are looking at how to get predictable revenue,\u201d Yellowlees said<\/p>\n
There are two main avenues creators can take when pursuing the early investor route: angel investing, where they put money directly into a company, and sweat equity, where they provide services and labor in exchange for partial ownership. Angel investing is really more of an option for a smaller group of top-earning creators<\/p>\n
\u201cCreators are making real money, so they have money to invest now, right? A few years ago, we weren\u2019t minting 20-something-year-old millionaires at the rate that we are now with these creator businesses,\u201d said McAndrew. \u201cThese businesses are sophisticated media companies; they\u2019ve got real revenue, real dollars, and these people are smart,\u201d he added. And the kinds of sophisticated creator entrepreneurs McAndrew references will have the financial teams to guide them through angel investing.\u00a0<\/p>\n
This shift raises a key question: which creators can bring valuable sweat equity to a cap table? For Yellowlees, brands should tap creators with strong growth and engagement. For Sarina Virk Torrendell, CEO and founder of AI operating system for creators, YouPop (with several creators on its cap table), it was about engagement<\/p>\n
\u201cAnyone who is coming on are not mega creators, and that was intentional,\u201d Torrendell said. \u201cPaid marketing is not always super efficient\u2026I think that for a pre-seed startup, it\u2019s super inefficient\u2026bringing creators on the cap table helped instill that trust, because if a creator is investing their time or their money, they obviously believe in what we\u2019re doing.\u201d<\/p>\n
McAndrew said brands should only consider creators who can provide real strategic leverage, not just ones who can post about the company<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s about insights and strategy,\u201d she said. \u201cPeople think that the creators are getting paid to post, and are getting equity to post. They\u2019re not. If they\u2019re getting equity, it\u2019s because they\u2019re teaching the startup how to market itself, right? Because a lot of these people, a lot of founders, are not experts in creator go-to-market.\u201d This type of distribution, and you need someone who\u2019s on the inside who understands the nuances of it, who can help you drive that.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jaclyn Johnson, CEO and co-founder of Cherub, said the platform initially launched as a way to connect more angel investors with brands after discovering that there was a healthy appetite for investment but not enough access. But Johnson and her team quickly realized many of the interested investors were also big players in the creator space. So they went to UTA to ask whether the agency was sourcing investment deals for their clients.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Johnson said UTA said the deals came in randomly, and clients were interested, but they had otherwise no idea how to hunt them down. \u201cWe decided to build the creator portion of the business, where you can connect with creators, celebrities, and soon-to-be management and talent agencies to get creators on the cap table from an investment perspective and a sweat equity perspective,\u201d Johnson said.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Cherub will soon launch a feature that helps its creators keep track of their responsibilities as either sweat equity partners or angel investors. The company\u2019s equity guide also laid out benchmarks for potential investment opportunities, suggesting that:<\/p>\n
- \n
- An advisory only role (strategic input, organic posts) should be worth 0.1% to 0.3%\u00a0 at seed standardized to a two year quarterly vesting schedule with a three month cliff. (a waiting period an employee or founder must complete before any of their stock options or shares begin to vest)<\/li>\n
- An advisory and services role (guaranteed content, paid social whitelisting, event appearances) should be around 0.25%\u00a0 to 0.75% \u00a0
\nat seed with a two year quarterly vesting schedule and a six month cliff.\u00a0<\/li>\n - A long-term collaborator or creative director role (hands-on operational services, co-branded products, sustained campaigns) should be around 0.75% to 3% at seed with a four year quarterly vesting schedule and a one year cliff.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Benchmarks like these matter because, as opportunities for creator investors grow, so does the risk of predatory deals, which offer low equity options for a ton of legwork. Yellowlees said the deals so far have varied wildly, which may be why these kinds of creator investments haven\u2019t scaled yet<\/p>\n
\u201cSome influencers might get taken advantage of,\u201d Yellowlees said. \u201cI hope that doesn\u2019t happen\u2026But there\u2019s definitely no one-way model, and there never will be because of how different every creator is.\u201d<\/p>\n
That\u2019s why education for both creators and brands regarding expectations, equity options, and more is critical on both sides. The five creator agency execs and investors interviewed for this article all believe these kinds of deals will become an increasingly popular option in a crowded, competitive creator economy.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is a really smart way to drive growth,\u201d said YouPop\u2019s Torrendell. \u201cIt\u2019s such a noisy time right now. Every category is saturated. It\u2019s super competitive.\u201d<\/p>\n
McAndrew took it a step further. She sees creators as the wedge that will help onboard the next generation of angel investors.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s an opportunity where this goes much beyond creators, but I love creators to start because it\u2019s a group of people who are high-earning,\u201d she said. \u201cThey\u2019re entrepreneurial. They have an ability to affect the outcome of what they\u2019re investing in, which is always fantastic. They\u2019re value-add investors\u2026they\u2019re also the distribution machines of the modern age. So if they\u2019re talking about making their first angel investments, guess what? Other high-net-worth people follow them.\u201d<\/p>\n
More in Media<\/h3>\n
View More
\nMember Exclusive<\/p>\nMedia Briefing: Publishers question whether personalization actually pays off<\/h4>\n
September 24, 2026<\/p>\n
Publishers are personalizing newsletters to get more value from readers, but questions remain over whether it\u2019s a meaningful differentiator<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/justfineinfotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/google-create-digiday.jpg\")
\nThe Programmatic Publisher<\/p>\nPublishers\u2019 scorecard on Google\u2019s ad tech remedies: they\u2019re progress, but far from a clean win<\/h4>\n
September 23, 2026<\/p>\n
After years of waiting for the DOJ to finally curb Google\u2019s ad tech power, publishers are finding the devil in these new remedies<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/justfineinfotech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/brand-creator-deals-digiday.jpg\")
\nDigiday Publishing Summit<\/p>\nWhat The New York Times looks for in AI licensing partnerships<\/h4>\n
September 23, 2026<\/p>\n
The New York Times is seeing a more publisher-friendly AI licensing ecosystem, but the marketplaces still have a long way to go<\/p>\n
\n\n Related:<\/strong>
\n <a href="https:\/\/yoursite.com\/automation<\/a>-training-benin\/” title=”Digital Automation Training Benin: 5 Winning Skills Employers Demand in 2026″>
\n Digital Automation Training Benin: 5 Winning Skills Employers Demand in 2026
\n <\/a>\n <\/p>\n\n <a href="https:\/\/yoursite.com\/automation-africa\/" title="WhatsApp<\/a> Marketing Automation Africa: 6 Dangerous Mistakes Brands Make in Nigeria”>
\n WhatsApp Marketing Automation Africa: 6 Dangerous Mistakes Brands Make in Nigeria
\n <\/a>\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\nWant to learn this practically?<\/h3>\n
Join Justfine Infotech<\/strong> and build real digital skills in AI, automation, web development, digital marketing, office productivity, e-commerce, freelancing and cybersecurity.<\/p>\n
Available Programmes:<\/strong>
\n 6 Weeks Certificate \u2022 3 Months Professional Certificate \u2022 6 Months Diploma \u2022 Full Professional Diploma<\/p>\nWhatsApp:<\/strong>
\n +229 01 57 57 99 15
\n +229 01 66 68 11 60<\/p>\n